System and method for machine learning application for providing medical test results using visual indicia

ABSTRACT

A method for providing diagnostic test results is provided. The method comprises providing a software application to be stored on a mobile device, the mobile device having a camera and a viewing screen, initiating operation of the camera, aligning the camera with a visual trigger associated with the diagnostic test, capturing an image of the diagnostic test, sending the image to a server, creating a pixel value array from the pixel values in the image, providing the pixel value array as inputs in a trained neural network, and providing either a positive or negative result from the trained neural network in response to the pixel value array.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/137,213, filed Sep. 20, 2018, entitled SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MACHINE LEARNING APPLICATION FOR PROVIDING MEDICAL TEST RESULTS USING VISUAL INDICIA, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/804,990, filed on Nov. 6, 2017, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/295,398, filed on Oct. 17, 2016, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,857,373 on Jan. 2, 2018. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/804,990 also claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/419,382, filed on Nov. 8, 2016. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/137,213 also claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/566,607, filed on Oct. 2, 2017. The contents of application Ser. Nos. 16/137,213, 15/804,990, 62/419,382, and 62/566,607, and the contents of U.S. Pat. No. 9,857,373, are incorporated by reference herein in their entireties.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The following disclosure is related to chromatographic immunoassays and, more specifically, to the detection of medical conditions in using a visual trigger.

BACKGROUND

When testing for the presence of medical conditions using a home test kit, ease of use of the test is paramount. Therefore, what is needed is a system and method for testing for a visual trigger to perform a diagnostic test.

SUMMARY

In one aspect thereof, a method for providing diagnostic test results is provided. The method comprises providing a software application to be stored on a mobile device, the mobile device having a camera and a viewing screen, initiating operation of the camera, aligning the camera with a visual trigger associated with the diagnostic test, capturing an image of the diagnostic test, sending the image to a server, creating a pixel value array from the pixel values in the image, providing the pixel value array as inputs in a trained neural network, and providing either a positive or negative result from the trained neural network in response to the pixel value array.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

For a more complete understanding, reference is now made to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying Drawings in which:

FIG. 1 illustrates a diagrammatic representation of one embodiment of a immunoassay test strip;

FIG. 2 illustrates a diagrammatic representation of one embodiment of an immunoassay test wherein an analyte is tested across a plurality of test strips;

FIG. 3 illustrates a diagrammatic representation of one embodiment of a testing device;

FIG. 4 illustrates a top view of the testing device of FIG. 3;

FIG. 5 illustrates a top view of one embodiment of a testing device;

FIG. 6 illustrates a top view of another embodiment of a testing device;

FIG. 7 illustrates a flowchart of one embodiment of a testing device use method;

FIG. 8A illustrates a diagrammatic representation of one embodiment of a process for a mobile device application for testing device image capture and image processing, wherein an image alignment indicator is not aligned with the subject of the image;

FIG. 8B illustrates a diagrammatic representation of one embodiment of a process for a mobile device application for testing device image capture and image processing, wherein an image alignment indicator is aligned with the subject of the image;

FIG. 9 illustrates a flowchart of one embodiment of an image analysis process using a mobile device;

FIG. 10 illustrates a diagrammatic representation of another embodiment of a process for a mobile device application for testing device image capture and image processing, wherein an image alignment indicator is aligned with the subject of the image;

FIG. 11 illustrates one embodiment of a consumer driven biologic and disease data collection system;

FIG. 12 illustrates one embodiment of a consumer driven biologic and disease data collection system;

FIG. 13 illustrates an example of a unique biologic ID database table;

FIG. 14 illustrates a flowchart of one embodiment of a biologic data collection and dissemination process;

FIG. 15 illustrates a perspective view of a system for scanning test strips;

FIG. 16 illustrates a cross-sectional view of the system of FIG. 15;

FIG. 17 illustrates one embodiment of a vertical flow immunoassay device;

FIG. 18 illustrates a cross-sectional view of one embodiment of the vertical immunoassay device of FIG. 17;

FIG. 19 illustrates a color gradient chart;

FIG. 20 illustrates a normalized past tests results rating chart;

FIG. 21 illustrates a mobile device displaying on a screen a mobile application variable test functionality;

FIG. 22 illustrates the mobile device of FIG. 21, wherein a housing of a testing device also includes thereon test function indicators.

FIG. 23 illustrates a diagrammatic view of one embodiment of an image recognition neural network;

FIG. 24 illustrates a representation of one embodiment of a testing device image divided into a plurality of tiles;

FIG. 25 illustrates a diagrammatic view of one embodiment of feeding a tile into a neural network to produce outputs;

FIG. 26 illustrates a diagrammatic view of one embodiment of a convolution process;

FIG. 27 illustrates a diagrammatic view of one embodiment of a downsampling process;

FIG. 28 illustrates a diagrammatic view of one embodiment an overall image recognition convolution and test results output process; and

FIG. 29 illustrates one embodiment of a possible image processing architecture.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Referring now to the drawings, wherein like reference numbers are used herein to designate like elements throughout, the various views and embodiments of an arbovirus indicative birth defect risk test are illustrated and described, and other possible embodiments are described. The figures are not necessarily drawn to scale, and in some instances the drawings have been exaggerated and/or simplified in places for illustrative purposes only. One of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate the many possible applications and variations based on the following examples of possible embodiments.

Referring now to FIG. 1, there is illustrated one embodiment of an immunoassay test strip 100. The test strip 100 is typically housed in a testing device configured to collect a biologic analyte 106 from a user and to direct to the biologic analyte 106 onto the testing strip 100. However, it will be understood that the biologic may be applied onto a strip 100 without the strip 100 needing to be within a testing device. The test strip 100 includes a backing 102. The test strip 100 is made up of multiple sections disposed on the backing 102. A sample pad 104 is disposed on one end of the strip 100, for collecting the biologic analyte 106. The biologic analyte 106 may be any biologic needed for use in the immunoassay, such as urine, blood, saliva, stool, sweat, or other biologics to be used as an analyte. Various methods may be used to acquire the needed biologic, and such may be provided to the user packaged with the test, such as swabs, vials, containers, dilutants and other solutions, or any other equipment required. In the case of a blood analyte, a few drops of blood may be obtained from a finger stick using a finger prick device. Such a blood analyte may be blood mixed with an adequate amount of buffered solution to create the sample analyte 106 or a blood sample that is not diluted or otherwise manipulated, in which case the blood only is the analyte 106.

The biologic analyte 106, after coming into contact with the sample pad 104, begins to migrate across the strip 100 by capillary action, coming into contact with other sections of the strip 100. A particle conjugate pad 108 is disposed between the sample pad 104 and a test line 110. The conjugate pad 108 may contain various reagents associated with a particular antigen, such as a virus, allergen, or bacteria, the reagents being items such antibodies, enzymes, or other reagents needed to diagnose the particular condition. The reagent in the conjugate pad 108 may be conjugated with particles of materials such as colloid gold or colored latex beads. As the analyte 106 migrates through the conjugate pad 108, antibodies present in the sample analyte 106 complex with the reagents in the conjugate pad 108, thereby creating an immune complex that will migrate to the test zone or test line 110.

The test line 110 (T) may be precoated with the relevant antigen in question, i.e., a virus, allergen, or bacteria, for the detection of antibodies associated with the particular antigen. The immune complex created when the analyte 106 passes through the conjugate pad 108 is captured onto the antigen contained on the test line 110. This may create a qualitative response on the strip where the test line 110 is located, such as a colored response. In some embodiments, the test line 110 may not be a line, but may be other shapes or symbols, such as a plus sign. If no antigen-anti-antigen complexes are present in the analyte, no reaction occurs in the test line 110 and a qualitative response will not occur.

After passing through the test line 110, the analyte migrates further along the strip to reach a control line 112, where excess anti-antibody-colloidal gold or latex conjugates get bound. A qualitative response may be shown at the control line 112, indicating that the sample has adequately migrated across the testing membrane or substrate as intended. It will be understood that the control line 112 is not necessarily needed to perform the test, and may be eliminated entirely, but the control line 112 does provide a comparative example for a user reading the test. For example, the control line 112, in embodiments where a colored qualitative response is provided, may appear as an overly saturated color, such as a dark or bright saturated red, once the sample reaches the control line 112. This saturated color may be used as a comparison against the qualitative response shown on the test line 110. For example, if the qualitative response shown on the test line 110 is a much lighter red than that on the test line 110, it may be that very little reaction occurred at the test line. Of course, if no response is shown at all at the test line 110, no reaction has occurred. If the qualitative response at the test line 110 is of a similar saturation to the control line 112, a strong reaction is indicated.

The strip 100 may not be a continuous substrate. Rather, the various sections of the strip 100 may be separate from each other, but all adhered to the backing 102. As shown in FIG. 1, the sample pad 104 and the conjugate pad 108 are separate structures from each other. The test line 100 or zone and the control line 112 or zone are both disposed as part of a nitrocellulose membrane strip 114. The nitrocellulose membrane strip 114 is also adhered to the backing 102, but separate from the sample pad 104 and the conjugate pad 106. As shown in FIG. 1, the end of the sample pad 104 adjacent to the conjugate pad 106 may overlap the conjugate pad 106, with that end of the sample pad 106 lying over the adjacent end of the conjugate pad 106. Similarly, the end of the conjugate pad adjacent to the nitrocellulose membrane strip 114 may lie over the end of the nitrocellulose membrane adjacent to the conjugate pad. This allows for the analyte 106 to be more easily deposited onto each section of the strip 100 as it migrates across the strip 100. After the analyte 106 migrates across the nitrocellulose membrane strip 114, and thus across the test line 110 and the control line 112, the analyte 106 comes into contact with a wick 116 for absorption and collection of the analyte 106. The end of the wick 116 adjacent to the nitrocellulose membrane strip 114 may lie over that adjacent end of the nitrocellulose membrane strip 114, as shown in FIG. 1.

Several Flow Immune Assays have been directed toward identifying proteins, molecules of interest, and even immunoglobulins IgG, IgA, and IgM. IgE is an antibody (immunoglobulin E) that is normally present in the blood freely circulating until it moves into the tissue where it is bound to mast cells through the receptor FcERI (F-C-epsilon-R-one) otherwise known as the high affinity IgE receptor. There is a small amount of IgE bound to IgE receptors (high and low affinity receptors) on basophils, eosinophils, and other cells in the blood and tissues.

Many assay systems are geared toward the detection of infectious proteins. All of the aforementioned tests use a non-human antibody—usually IgG type—e.g., goat IgG antibody directed against a protein of interest to detect the protein of interest from the sample (blood, urine, saliva, sweat, etc.). This antibody complexes with protein of interest and forms a complex that travels across the membrane until it reaches the test zone. In the test zone there is an IgG type antibody directed against IgG from that species of animal. As further described herein, the present detecting apparatus and method use human (patient/consumer-derived) antibodies from the sample and the test zone that contains a humanized antibody directed against the protein of interest that is preconjugated to a detecting substance that results in a visual change.

Summary of Target Antigen:

-   -   The target antigens may be proteins, glycoproteins, lipoproteins         or other molecular substances capable of eliciting an immune         reaction and/or being bound by human specific IgE (sIgE).

Immune assay to detect specific IgE:

-   -   In the detecting apparatus and method of using the same, the         antigens are proteins conjugated to a noble metal, for example,         gold, or latex conjugated to antigen in the test zone, for the         purpose of detecting the presence of specific IgE (e.g.,         anti-peanut IgE in a blood sample from a finger prick). For         example, an IgG class antibody (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, or IgG4) or         fragments of those classes of antibodies (fab fragments) whose         origin may be any animal species (goat, rat, human, etc.)         capable of detecting human IgE (anti-IgE IgG)—a suitable         commercially available humanized antibody, such as omaluzimab         may be used—may be used to form immune complexes of         IgG-anti-IgE-sIgE that will migrate to the test zone having         selected specific IgE that can bind to the conjugated antigen.

Immune assay to detect total IgE (not concerned about specific IgE):

-   -   Another embodiment includes using an IgG class antibody (IgG1,         IgG2, IgG3, or IgG4) or fragments of those classes of antibodies         (fab fragments) whose origin may be any animal species (goat,         rat, human, etc.) capable of detecting human IgE (anti-IgE         IgG)—a suitable commercially available humanized antibody that         is preconjugated to a detecting molecule that results in a color         change when bound to IgE as the target antigen in the test zone.

Referring now to FIG. 2, there is illustrated one embodiment of an immunoassay test 200 wherein an analyte 202 is tested across a plurality of test strips 204. The plurality of test strips 204 may each be configured for testing for a particular antigen. For instance, one strip may be for testing for the presence of streptococcal bacteria (strep throat), one strip may be for testing for a peanut allergy, one strip may be for testing for the Zika virus, etc. Additionally, each strip may also test for multiple antigens. For example, as shown in FIG. 2, multiple testing panels or lines maybe be incorporated. Each line may be for a particular antigen. As shown in FIG. 2, multiple test lines 206, 208, and 208 may be disposed along the plurality of strips 204. A strip testing for allergens may have a panel for testing for peanut allergies shown at test line 206 (CH1), for cat allergies shown at test line 208 (CH2), or grass allergies shown at test line 210 (CH3).

Other examples of configurations for the testing panels can be, but are not limited to: 1) Food 5: Peanut, milk, soy, wheat, egg; 2) Nut and seed panel: almond, cashew, hazelnut, peanut, pecan, walnut, sesame seed, sunflower seed; 3) seafood: crab, lobster, shrimp, salmon, tuna; 4) Pets: cat, dog; 5) Indoor allergens: dust mites, mold mix (alternaria, aspergillus, penicillium, cladosporium), cat, dog; and 6) seasonal allergens: grass (Bermuda, bahia, Johnson, rye, timothy), trees (oak, elm, cedar, mesquite, pine, etc.), weeds (pigweed, ragweed, sage, Russian thistle).

With respect to other non-allergen antigens, the panels may be for testing for strep, Zika, flu, anthrax, cold viruses, cancer, HPV, Lyme disease, mononucleosis (mono), and other illnesses, and/or other conditions such as pregnancy (hCG detection) and disease risks. Some embodiments may allow for the testing of various arboviruses (arthropod-borne viruses). Arboviruses are viruses that are transmitted by arthropods, with mosquitos being a common vector for the virus. Vectors are organisms that transfer the virus from a host that carries the virus. Thus, in the case of mosquitos, a mosquito that feeds on a host that is infected with a virus may infect others when that mosquito again feeds on an uninfected host. Well-known arboviruses include Dengue virus, Japanese encephalitis virus, Rift Valley fever virus, West Nile virus, yellow fever virus, chikungunya, and Zika virus. Urine, blood, and saliva and other biologics may be used for arboviruses testing.

Certain antigens or medical conditions may be logically paired together. For instance, a testing device may include both a strip for detection of pregnancy and a strip for the detection of the zika virus, as the Zika virus has been known to cause birth defects in infants born to pregnant women that are infected with Zika. Thus, combining these two tests into a single testing device or kit would alert a woman to a potential Zika infection proximate in time to the time she also discovers she is pregnant, allowing the woman to seek medical attention immediately. This is a substantial improvement over past Zika testing, where a woman may be required to wait weeks before results are returned from a lab after having the biologic collected by her physician. In many cases, this may lead to a woman having passed a state-mandated cutoff point for abortions, such as 24 weeks in some states. Combining a Zika test with a pregnancy test and physically linking the two tests, and thus allowing for a woman to determine a Zika risk at the time of taking a pregnancy test, in which a pregnancy test may be taken as soon as six days after conception, allows for that woman to take action much sooner than the state mandated cutoff and waiting for lab results would allow.

Various testing devices that include the test strip 100 or strips may be used, such as a slide that supports the test strip 100, a cassette based diagnostic test, a dipstick, or combinations thereof. The test results in various embodiments may be in the form of a visual qualitative reading test, a visual semiquantitative format, a reader quantitative assay format, and/or combinations thereof. Additionally, an electronic implementation may be used where the result is displayed digitally on a screen disposed within the apparatus, and visible to the user.

The apparatus and method of detection may be a “one-step” approach from sample to reading without sample dilution or other sample manipulation. The sample may be diluted or endure other sample manipulation, for example the blood sample is diluted with a buffer.

Referring now to FIG. 3, there is illustrated a diagrammatic representation of one embodiment of a testing device 300. The testing device 300 includes a housing 302 that forms the body of the testing device. The housing 302 may be made of plastic, metal, or any material durable enough for shipping and subsequent handling by a user. The housing 302 may be hollow so that a plurality of test strips 304 may be housed within and so that a biologic may be deposited within the housing 302. The testing device 300 may further have a plurality of windows 306, each window being associated with one of the plurality of test strips 304, and allowing for a user to view at least the section of the nitrocellulose membrane strip 114 where the test line 110 and control line 112 are located. The plurality of windows 306 may be open, or covered with plastic, glass, or other materials that allow for viewing the plurality of strips 304. A sample well 308 may be disposed on a surface of the housing 302 to allow a user to deposit a biologic into the housing 302. The sample well 308 would be disposed over or near the sample pad 104 of the test strip or strips 100. In the embodiment shown in FIG. 3, a single sample well 308 is included for collection of a single type of biologic for testing, with each of the plurality of strips 304 being suited for testing for antigens using that particular biologic sample type. For example, if the testing device 300 is a combined pregnancy and Zika test, having both a pregnancy strip and a Zika strip, a urine sample may be deposited into the sample well 308, causing the urine sample to come into contact with the sample pad 104 on both the pregnancy strip and the Zika strip. It will be understood that both of these tests may also be performed with a blood sample.

The testing device 300 may also have disposed on the surface of the housing a crosshair symbol 310 (visual trigger), used as an alignment target. This symbol may be a graphic printed or adhered to the testing device 300. The crosshair symbol 310 is used to align the testing device 300 for the taking of an image of the testing device 300 using a camera on a mobile device, for use in a mobile device application described herein. In other embodiments, the crosshair symbol 310 may be other types of symbols, such as a simple shape (circle, square, etc.), other images (such as a medical cross symbol, an arrow, etc.), or any other type of image.

Referring now to FIG. 4, there is illustrated a top view of the testing device 300. There is again shown the housing 302, the plurality of test strips 304, the plurality of windows 306, the sample well 308, and the crosshair symbol 310.

Referring now to FIG. 5, there is illustrated a top view of one embodiment of a testing device 500. The testing device 500 includes a housing 502 having a plurality of test strips 504 within the housing 502 and a plurality of windows 506 for display of the plurality of strips 504. The housing 502 also includes a plurality of sample wells 508 disposed on one side of the testing device 500. Each of the plurality of sample wells 508 is associated with one of the plurality of test strips 504 and each of the plurality of sample wells 508 may be disposed over one of the sample pads 104 on the associated one of the plurality of test strips 504. This allows for a biologic to be deposited into each of the plurality of sample wells 508, with each well 508 serving to transfer the biologic to the test strip underneath the sample well. The testing device 500 further includes a crosshair 510. The crosshair symbol 510 is used to align the testing device 500 for the taking of an image of the testing device 500 using a camera on a mobile device, for use in a mobile device application described herein.

Referring now to FIG. 6, there is illustrated a top view of another embodiment of a testing device 600. The testing device 600 includes a housing 602 having a plurality of test strips 604 within the housing 602 and a plurality of windows 606 for display of the plurality of strips 604. The housing 602 also includes a plurality of sample wells 608. In this embodiment, the sample wells are located on different ends of the housing 602. In the case of a two test strip device, the sample wells 608 are disposed on opposite ends of the testing device 600. The strips 604 would be arranged within the housing in such a way as to allow the sample pad 104 on each of the strip to be disposed underneath one of the sample wells 608. This is useful for testing devices that require different biological samples. For example, if the testing device 600 required a urine sample for one strip and a blood sample for the other strip, having the wells 608 disposed on opposite sides of the testing device would reduce the likelihood that a urine sample, for instance, might be inadvertently deposited into the well designated for the blood sample. In embodiments where there are more than two strips, and more than two wells, the well positions may alternate between the two sides of the testing device. For instance, a first well for a first strip might be disposed on the left side of the testing device, a second well for a second strip might be disposed on the right side of the testing device, a third well for a third strip might be disposed on the left side of the testing device, a fourth well for a fourth strip might be disposed on the right side of the testing device, and so on. The testing device 600 further includes a crosshair 610. The crosshair symbol 610 is used to align the testing device 600 for the taking of an image of the testing device 600 using a camera on a mobile device, for use in a mobile device application described herein.

The diagnostic test can, for example, be produced in a various formats for different users, such as, but not limited to, consumer/in-home use where the test is purchased through retail channels which will allow individuals to get an immediate, cost-effective test result that can lead to specific avoidance and treatment through follow-up with a medical professional.

The diagnostic test can be provided to and used by hospitals and clinics to provide rapid, on-site test results that are required to prescribe certain medications, such as omaluzimab, by their FDA labels.

This diagnostic assay can be modified to detect the presence of specific IgE in pets.

It is also noted that housing 602 is designed such that both strips 604 are disposed in physical proximity thereto and in the same actual housing. In this manner, both sets are linked physically to each other such that they cannot be separated and can be associated with a single individual and the actual test cannot be separated. As such, when a patient applies the specimens to the two areas 608 and the test results are exhibited, there is a high probability that two tests were performed at the same time associated with the same patient. Additionally, and electronic chip (not shown) can be embedded within the housing 602 such that the housing 602 can be registered to a specific patient and associated with the medical records of that patient.

Referring now to FIG. 7, there is illustrated a flowchart of one embodiment of a testing device use method 700. The method 700 begins at step 702 where a biologic is collected in a sample well or wells of a testing device. The biologic collected may be a non-diluted or non-manipulated biologic, such as blood, urine, or saliva from the user of the test. Diluted or manipulated biologics may be used instead, as required by the specific test. For example, if a viral test requires the biologic to be added to a solution, the biologic could be added to a solution that has previously been placed in a sterilized vial provided with the testing device. After the required amount of time has passed, the solution containing the biologic could be deposited into the well or wells. At step 704, the biologic contacts a sample pad disposed on a strip or strips within the testing device. At step 706, the biologic migrates along the strip or strips to come into contact with a conjugate pad containing antibodies. Antibodies present in the biologic will complex with the antibodies in the conjugate pad to create an immune complex. At step 708, the biologic migrates into a test zone of the strip or strips, coming into contact with an antigen. The antibodies in the conjugate pad serve to provide a means of detection, such as a colored response, if the immune complex binds with the antigen present in the test zone of the strip. At decision block 710, binding of the antibodies with the antigen may or may not occur depending on if antibodies associated with the antigen are present in the biologic or not. If a binding between the antibodies and the antigen does not occur the process moves to step 712 where no qualitative response is produced on the test line. If a binding does occur, at step 714 a qualitative response is produced on the test line. Whether a binding occurs or not, and whether a qualitative response is produced or not, the process moves to step 716 where the biologic migrates into a control zone of the strip or strips where excess conjugates get bound and produces a qualitative control zone reaction indicating that the sample has adequately migrated across the testing zone.

It will be understood by one skilled in the art that the antibodies and antigens applied to the testing strip may be altered depending on the type of condition being tested. For example, in the case of testing for medical conditions that do not involve an illness or infection, like preganancy, and thus the sample biologic does not contain antibodies associated with the condition, antibodies that react to markers being tested for may be applied to the testing strip instead of an antigen. For instance, pregnancy test requires testing for the presence of hCG. Since hCG is a hormone and not an antibody produced in response to an infection, the testing strip may have antibodies that will react to the presence of hCG applied to the testing zone or line of the testing strip, as well as to the conjugate pad. Similarly, some tests might require antibodies be applied to the testing strip to detect antigens present in the sample, rather than antibodies.

Referring now to FIGS. 8A and 8B, there is illustrated a diagrammatic view of one embodiment of a process 800 for a mobile device application for testing device image capture and image processing. The mobile device application allows for an image of a testing device, such as testing device 300, to be captured using a camera installed on a mobile device 802 having a screen 804. While the mobile device 802 displays on the screen 804 the scene captured by the camera, the mobile device application also displays a graphic on the screen 804 in the form of a boxed outline 806, the size of the outline 806 corresponding to the size of the testing device 300. Also displayed on the screen of the mobile device 802 within or near the outline is a crosshair graphic 808. A user of the mobile device 802 attempts to align the outline 806 with the borders of the testing device 300 and also attempts to align the crosshair graphic 808 with the crosshair 310 on the testing device 300. While alignment has not yet been achieved, a misalignment warning 810 may appear on the screen of the mobile device 802, indicating to the user that alignment has not yet been achieved. Such is shown in FIG. 8A.

In FIG. 8B, there is shown the result of a successful alignment of the outline 806 with the testing device 300 and successful alignment of the crosshair graphic 808 with the crosshair 310 on the testing device 300. As shown in FIG. 8B, once aligned, a success indicator 812 may appear, such as a check mark or other positive status symbol, on the aligned image. Successful alignment causes the camera on the mobile device 802 to capture the current image of the testing device 300. Other checks may occur, including ensuring that the image is focused before the image is saved. This image is then processed to determine a result based on the severity of the reaction occurring on the test strip. The mobile device application performs an analysis of the test line captured in the image, counting the number of colored pixels, as well as determining the intensity of the color. The mobile device may then compare this number and color intensity to that in the control line, providing a mathematical evaluation of the test line. Utilizing unique wavelengths of light for illumination in conjunction with either CMOS or CCD detection technology, a signal rich image is produced of the test lines to detect the colloid gold or latex particles. This provides an advantage because a user simply looking at the two lines may not know what the test line indicates, such as when the colored line does appears on the strip, but it is a faded line, rather than a dark line. Based on this analysis, the mobile device application may provide a results indicator 814.

The results indicator 814 may be a qualitative result or a quantitative result. For example, and as shown in FIG. 8B, a qualitative result for the results indicator 814 may indicate, in the case of a testing device for testing pregnancy as well as an infection, a plus sign next to a line reading “pregnant:” and a plus sign next to a line reading “infection:” to indicate that the user is both pregnant and infected with the bacteria or virus being tested, such as the Zika virus. For a quantitative result, the results might provide a numeric rating. For instance, a rating system between 1-100 may be used. If the results provide a low rating to the user, such as a rating of 10, this indicates a low risk of infection, although medical attention may be sought by the user anyway. For example, if the user is pregnant, and also receives a 10 rating for Zika, this may indicate that Zika was detected in low amounts. However, the user may still seek medical attention or further testing from her doctor because Zika has been known to cause birth defects. If the rating is a high rating, such as 95, this indicates that an infection has most likely occurred and medical attention should be sought immediately.

This same quantitative rating system may be applied to any test (viral infections, bacterial infections, pregnancy, and other health conditions), as the quantitative test can be performed using the software described herein to accurately test bound antibody concentrations on the test strip. In some embodiments, a combined qualitative and quantitative result may be presented, such as both a rating and a plus or minus sign being presented, or other types of quantitative and qualitative indications. Additionally, various combinations of tests may be provided for in the testing device, such as pregnancy/Zika, preganancy/flu, pregnancy/strep/Zika, etc.

Referring now to FIG. 9, there is illustrated a flowchart of one embodiment of an image analysis process 900 using a mobile device. At step 902 a mobile device application is launched. At step 904 a camera on the mobile device is activated and a crosshair indicator and a testing device outline appear on the mobile device screen. At step 906 the crosshair indicator presented on the screen of the mobile device is aligned with a crosshair icon on the testing device and the device outline presented on the screen of the mobile device is aligned with the borders of a testing device. At step 908, an indicator of successful alignment is presented on the screen and an image of the testing device is taken by the mobile device camera. At step 910, the mobile device application processes the image of the testing device to determine test line strength by counting the number of colored pixels contained in the test line. At step 912, the mobile device application correlates line intensity with analyte concentrations to further determine test line strength. At step 914, the mobile device application presents the test results based on pixel count and line intensity, providing either a qualitative or quantitative result.

In some embodiments, the number of pixels indicating bound antibodies on the strip may be measured against that in the control line to compare line intensity between the two lines, with the control line acting as an example of a strong reaction, indicating a strong infection, and determining how close the test line intensity is to the control line. This would lead to a logical quantitative result. For instance, if the test line is determined to have a pixel count and line intensity that is 25% of the pixel count and line intensity of the control line, a rating of 25 may be given. If a qualitative result is to be provided, a rating of 25 may give a qualitative result that is negative, or it could be positive depending on the type of condition being tested and known actual infection results where a rating of 25 occurred for that condition.

In some embodiments, the test line may not be compared with the control line to determine a result. Rather, the mobile device application may have access to a database having data on numerous past tests for the same condition. This data may instead be used as the control. This allows the application on the mobile device to retrieve data on past tests and compare the test line data of the current test to past tests. Overall data for past tests may be provided and compared against, such as providing an average or a curve of past tests, or individual tests rated as having accurate results may be compared against.

In addition to a status result of an infection or other medical condition being provided to the user, other indicators of health may also be tested and results thereon provided. This provides for potential early identification of pregnancy and risk of morbidity, allowing for medical attention to be sought much more quickly. Indicators of health may be detected from biologics, such as urine and blood. Urine, for example, allows for the detection of glucose levels, proteins, bacteria, and infectious markers. In the case of glucose, glucose is usually not found in urine, but, if it is, that is an indicator of extremely high levels of glucose in the body, where the kidneys release excess glucose into urine. This is often a sign of diabetes. Protein in the urine may indicate a malfunctioning of the kidneys, which could be the result of high blood pressure. Similarly, if blood is detected in urine, it could be a sign of a problem with the kidneys or the bladder. Blood, for example, allows for the detection of glucose, inflammation, hormones, genetic defect risks, and metabolic endocrine disorders.

Referring now to FIG. 10, there is illustrated another embodiment of a successful alignment of the outline 806 with the testing device 300 and successful alignment of the crosshair graphic 808 with the crosshair 310 on the testing device 300, wherein quantitative results for health risk indicators are provided. In this embodiment, the results indicator 814 provides a qualitative result for pregnancy, and quantitative results for other health risk indicators. In the embodiment shown in FIG. 10, the health risk indicators being tested are markers for blood pressure and for glucose levels. For blood pressure, this is a test for markers in the blood that can be associated with high blood pressure. These could be test for such things as low levels of vitamin D and the such. Studies have shown that patients suffering from essential hypertension will be under oxidative stress and Malondialdehyde (MDA) is the principal and most studied product of polyunsaturated fatty acid pre-oxidation. This can show an indirect correlation with anti-oxidants, particularly with superoxide dismutases (SODs) (r=0.573) and catalase (r=0.633) representative anti-oxidant are involved in reducing the stress of a patient's biological system during hypertension. Another marker for hypertension is buildup of uric acid, where in uric acid is a marker for xanthine oxidase-associated oxidants and that the latter could be driving the hypertensive response. Additional markers are cortisol, a hormone. The test strips 604 can test for the different biological markers.

The results indicator 814 provides numeric ratings, in this case, 1-100, with the blood pressure rating being 88 and the glucose rating being 95. This indicates that both blood pressure and glucose are extremely high. Due to this, an additional alert indicator 1002 is presented to the user on the screen of the mobile device, alerting the user to seek medical attention immediately. This is to ensure that the health of both the pregnant woman and the fetus can be checked as close to the time of pregnancy detection as possible and medical attention received if needed.

Referring now to FIG. 11, there is provided a flowchart of one embodiment of a pregnancy disease risk assessment process 1100. The process 1100 begins at step 1102 where a biologic is collected and deposited in a testing device for testing of the biologic. At step 1104, the biologic is processed by the testing device for detection of pregnancy and various other medical conditions. These medical conditions may be high blood pressure, diabetes, bacterial or viral infections, inflammation, an increase in hormone levels, genetic disease markers, and/or metabolic disorders. At step 1106, a mobile device is used to capture an image of the testing device after testing is complete. In some embodiments, test results may be immediate. In other embodiments, and depending on the medical conditions being tested, the test may take a certain amount of time to complete. In this case, the user of the test would be alerted to this fact in instructions provided with the testing device. Additionally, a visual indicator on the testing device may alert the user that a test is now complete. At step 1108, the mobile device provides a rating for each medical condition being tested, such as that described with respect to FIG. 10 herein.

At decision block 1110, it is determined whether the ratings for each condition exceed a certain threshold for that condition. If not, the process 1100 moves to step 1112, where an indication is presented to the user via the mobile device screen that medical attention is not currently advised or necessary. If at step 1110 it is determined that at least one of the medical conditions being tested rises above a certain threshold, the process 1100 moves to step 1114 where a warning is presented to the user via the mobile device screen that medical attention is advised. The thresholds for medical conditions may not trigger a warning even if a rating exceeds a threshold, if, in the event of multiple tests being performed, the combined test results do not warrant immediate medical attention. For example, if a user is testing for a cold virus, blood pressure, and glucose, and only the cold virus rating is above the threshold, there may not be a warning provided to the user. Additionally, ratings may be weighted or aggregated based on the medical conditions being tested. For example, if blood pressure, inflammation, and glucose are being tested for, and they all are given only moderate ratings that do not rise above the threshold for any condition individually, an warning to seek medical attention may still be provided due to the combination of conditions taken together.

Referring now to FIG. 12, there is illustrated one embodiment of a consumer driven biologic and disease data collection system 1200. Data collected from users performing the tests disclosed herein effectively can provide a wealth of information. As tests are performed data may be passed by a plurality of mobile devices 1202 being used by users performing tests to a database 1204, the database being at a remote server 1206, over a network 1208. The user is sourcing a biologic from user's own body. This is done at home, not in a lab, hospital, or clinic. Each particular test would expect a certain type of biologic to be provided. For instance, for a pregnancy test, a urine sample is provided and tested for pregnancy markers. For a stool test, the stool might be dissolved in a vial with a solution provided with the testing device/kit, and tested for various disease or infectious markers. Data and results from the tests may be stored on the database 1204 at the remote server 1206. As described herein, this data may be used as a control for testing analysis for users of the plurality of mobile devices 1202. This data may also be used to provide data sets for biologics to a medical organization 1210. The medical organization 1210 may be doctor's offices, researchers, hospitals, testing labs, and other individuals or organizations that have an interest in the health and analysis of users taking the test and of their biologic samples. In this way, data can be gathered from a variety of biologics tested for a variety of different medical conditions and characteristics.

Referring now to FIG. 13, there is illustrated an example of a unique biologic ID database table 1300. The table 1300 is illustrative of the type of data stored in association with data for a biologic transmitted by the plurality of mobile devices 1202 for storage on the database 1204. A biologic ID header 1302 is provided that shows that the biologic sample has been given a unique ID. All data concerning the biologic may be stored in association with the unique biologic ID. The table 1300 also includes a biologic type entry 1304. This designates what type of biologic that the biologic associated with the unique ID is, such as blood, urine, stool, saliva, sweat, or other biologics. The table 1300 also provides a plurality of test ratings 1304, for various tests performed on the biologic. In the example shown in FIG. 13, a blood biologic is provided having an assigned ID of 2402, and having been testing for pregnancy markers, the Zika virus, and for glucose levels. The rating for pregnancy was a 99 rating, the rating for a Zika infection was a 75, and the rating for glucose levels was a 10. This would indicate that the test subject has an extremely high likelihood of both a pregnancy and a Zika infection, which would have resulted in a warning to seek medical attention at the conclusion of the tests. Other information may also be stored in the database in relation to the biologic, including other condition ratings, time and date each test was performed, user information such as ethnicity, gender, and age, and status indicators such as whether a test subject visited a physician as a result of the tests. The database 1204 thus provides the test subject with a growing collection of information that may be accessed by the test subject. This allows the test subject to present the test results to her physician for medical attention or additional testing, and allows for others who may access the database, such as disease researchers, to have access to data on various biologic samples and their markers.

Referring now to FIG. 14, there is illustrated a flowchart of one embodiment of a biologic data collection and dissemination process 1400. The process 1400 begins at step 1402 where a user of a testing device collects a biologic sample for use in a test or a series of tests. At step 1404, the test or series of tests are performed on the biologic sample. At step 1406, a mobile device application checks the biologic sample the testing device result to determine a quantitative result of the test to provide a correlative value for the condition being tested in the biologic sample. At step 1408, the test results and correlative values, or multiple values if multiple tests on the biologic sample were conducted, are transmitted to the remote server 1206. At step 1410, the biologic sample is given a unique identification number in the database 1204. At step 1412, the test results and correlative value or values are stored in the database 1204 in association with the unique identification number given to the biologic sample collected and in association with the particular tests performed. This way, the particular biologic sample may have various characteristics stored and retrieved in association with the biologic sample, and the test results may also be retrieved when data on a particular test is needed on a cross-section of users.

At step 1414, the results are provided to the user on the user's mobile device. At step 1416, the results are provided to the user's healthcare provider. The healthcare provider may receive the test results due to a visit from the user, the user bringing the results of the test with her on her mobile device, or the healthcare provider may receive the results from the database 1204 if the healthcare provider has permission to access the database 1204, or if access is granted in anticipation of the user's appointment with the healthcare provider. At step 1418, the test results are also provided to other healthcare industry individuals and organizations, including medical researchers, hospitals, and others.

Referring now to FIG. 15, there is illustrated a perspective view of a system for scanning test strips. The housing 604, as described hereinabove with respect to FIG. 6, is illustrated as being disposed within a slot 1502 in a test housing 1504. The test housing 1504 is connected through a line 1506 to a PC 1508. When the housing 604 containing the test strips 604 after being subjected to the biologics is inserted within the slot 1502, the test housing 1504 will scan the test strips 604 and analyze the results with the PC 1508. The PC 1508 will run some type of algorithm that can analyze the results of both of the test strips 604. There can be provided to indicators 1510 and 1512 on the surface of the test housing 1504, one being, for example, a ready LED and one being a green LED. The PC 1508, after analyzing results, can then provide a warning indicator such as lighting up the green LED for a positive indication of pregnancy and the red LED for indicating that there is some issue. As an example, suppose that the second test strip tested for the Zika virus. If so, a warning would be appropriate to output and activate the red LED. There could be any other type of indicator associated with the second test at 604 that, in a combination with the test results of the first test strip, i.e. for testing for the presence of a pregnancy state, testing for such things as diabetes, etc. Further, although only two test strips 604 are illustrated, there could be multiple test strips testing for many different biological issues that may be present in an individual. In this embodiment, by inserting the housing 602 into the test housing 1504 and allowing the PC 1508 to analyze the results, the indicators associated with the test strips can be analyzed with the assumption that all of the test return results were associated with an individual and in proximate time to each other. That means that the individual patient applied biological specimens, such as urine, blood, etc., to the appropriate test strips and, since these were all contained within the same test strip housing 602, this provides an indication that they are associated with a single patient. Further, the test performed will typically be a test that will provide a very short-term response. Thus, the specimens can be applied to the test strips 604 in the test strip housing 602 and then inserted within the slot 1502 for testing by the PC 1508.

Referring now to FIG. 16, there is illustrated a cross-section of the test housing 1504. It can be seen that the test strip housing 1602 is passed in slot 1502 past the camera 1602. The camera 1602 is operable to scan a small cross-section of the test strips 604 on the surface thereof as the test strip housing 602 passes thereby. Of course, there could also be a much larger camera provided for taking an entire image of the test strips 604 after being inserted within the test housing 1504. The camera 1602 is connected via a wire 1604 two in electronics package 1606 to process the information and send it to the PC 1508. The electronics package 1606 will also drive the indicators 1510 and 1512.

Referring now to FIG. 17, there is illustrated one embodiment of a vertical flow immunoassay device 1700. It will be understood that testing device 300 and other embodiments herein illustrate a lateral flow immunoassay device. However, other types of immunoassay devices may be used. For example, vertical flow immunoassay devices may be used, a two-sided flow through assay, or even a sandwich ELISA test may be run.

The testing device 1700 includes a housing 1702 that forms the body of the testing device. The housing 1702 may be made of plastic, metal, or any material durable enough for shipping and subsequent handling by a user. The housing 1702 may be hollow so that a plurality of immunoassay test pads 1704 may be housed within and so that a biologic may be deposited within the housing 1702. The testing device 1700 may further have a plurality of sample wells 1706, each sample well having one of the plurality of immunoassay test pads 1704 disposed within, and allowing for a user to view at least a section of a nitrocellulose membrane of each of the immunoassay test pads 1704, the membrane 1708 having a test line 1708 and control line 1710. The testing device 1700 may also have disposed on the surface of the housing a crosshair symbol 1712, used as an alignment target. This symbol may be a graphic printed or adhered to the testing device 1700. The crosshair symbol 1712 is used to align the testing device 1700 for the taking of an image of the testing device 1700 using a camera on a mobile device, for use in a mobile device application described herein. In other embodiments, the crosshair symbol 1712 may be other types of symbols, such as a simple shape (circle, square, etc.), other images (such as a medical cross symbol, an arrow, etc.), or any other type of image. In other embodiments, the device 1700 may be configured in such a way as to allow a biologic sample to be deposited into a sample well, and to present the results of the test on the opposite side of the housing. Such a configuration would allow the biologic to flow through the testing pad within the housing, with the reaction occurring on a reactive membrane on the side of the device opposite the sample well, with the device having a window for viewing the results.

Referring now to FIG. 18, there is illustrated a cross-sectional view of one embodiment of the vertical immunoassay device 1700. There is shown one of the plurality of immunoassay test pads 1704 residing within the housing 1702 below one of the plurality of sample wells 1706. The one of the plurality of immunoassay test pads 1704 includes a immunoreactive membrane 1802, such as the nitrocellulose membranes disclosed herein. The immunoreactive membrane 1802 may have particle conjugates disposed thereon that binds when a biologic sample is received onto the immunoreactive membrane 1802 via the sample well 1706, if the biologic sample contains the antigens or antibodies, or other indicators, for which the test is configured. The one of the plurality of immunoassay test pads 1704 also includes an absorbent pad 1804 for collection of excess biologic sample. It will be understood that the cross-sectional view illustrated in FIG. 18 shows one well of the plurality of sample wells 1704. The other wells included in the device 1700 would be configured in a similar manner as that shown in FIG. 18. There may also be included in the device 1700 an inner separating wall between each of the plurality of immunoassay test pads 1704, to ensure that excess biologic material that is not adequately absorbed by the absorbent pad 1804 does not contaminate neighboring immunoassay test pads.

Referring now to FIG. 19, there is illustrated a color gradient chart 1900. When the mobile application described herein captures an image of the testing device, in some embodiments each pixel that makes up the test line captured in the image is processed to place it on a color gradient scale. In some embodiments, this placement may be done by examining the RGB values of the pixel. For any given test, there may be a visual color indicator (such as a test line) presented to the user of the test to indicate whether a reaction occurred. The color that is to be presented is known for the given test. Additionally, in some embodiments, the strength of the reaction will affect the strength of the color indicator. For example, if a test is supposed to produce a brown colored indicator, an image can be taken of the colored indicator to examine each pixel of the colored indicator to determine the strength of the color produced on the testing device, which indicates the strength of the reaction, and thus the risk level for the user.

The embodiment illustrated in FIG. 19 uses as an example a set of pixel RGB results for a test that produces a red colored indicator on the test strip when a reaction has occurred. There can be seen an origin point 1902 on the chart 1900, wherein the RGB value is (255, 255, 255) or white. This may represent a no reaction state for the test strip, since the test line on the strip may only appear as a white blank space if no reaction has occurred. An x axis 1904 represents the color green, wherein the amount of green in the pixel decreases as it moves away from the origin in relation to the x axis 1904. A y axis 1906 represents the color blue, wherein the amount of blue in the pixel decreases as it moves away from the origin in relation to they axis 1906. A diagonal line 1908 running in between the x axis 1904 and the y axis 1906 represents the color red, wherein the diagonal line 1908 running through the center of the chart 1900 is a maximum red color all along the diagonal line 1908. If a pixel has less red than a 255 value, the pixel would be plotted away from the diagonal line 1908 in relation to whichever color is more predominant. For instance, if the pixel has RGB values of (127, 50, 205), a shade of purple, the pixel would be plotted somewhere in the lower right quadrant of the chart 1900. FIG. 19 further illustrates an example plurality of pixel plot points 1910, connected by a curved line, wherein the example plurality of pixel plot points 1910 shows tests results that likely indicate a positive reaction, as the plot points are all located near the diagonal line 1908, demonstrating that the colored indicator was a heavy red color for the most part.

Referring now to FIG. 20, there is illustrated a normalized past tests results chart 2000. The captured pixels may be normalized into a single value for determining whether there is a likelihood of infection, pregnancy, or whatever else the test is designed to detect. This may be done in various ways. For example, the shade of red in all the pixels may be averaged to reach a single RGB value. Outliers may be left out so that the average is not heavily skewed, especially when there are few outliers present. This RGB value may then be given a value, such as a risk rating, ranging from 0 to 100. For example, an RGB value of (255, 255, 255) would be given a rating of 0. An RGB value of (255, 0, 0) would be given a rating of 100. An RGB value of (205, 150, 75) may be given a rating of 70, and so on. This normalized value may then be used to compare the user of the test to users of past tests to determine a risk level. In some embodiments, the control line and the test line may be captured and the results compared, as well. In addition, the real results of risk levels may also be used to adjust the stored normalized value. For instance, if a particular RGB value that seems to indicate a strong reaction repeatedly was found to not indicate an infection, this value may be adjusted to provide a lower risk rating. For instance, if a physician who saw a patient who had a (205, 150, 75) RGB value later reported to the operator of the server 1206 that further testing showed no infection was present, and if this trend continued substantially as reported by other physicians or medical organizations, subsequent test results by other test users that were near the RGB value of (205, 150, 75) may be given a lower rating.

Chart 2000 illustrates how past tests results may be collected and used to determine the risk of a current test user. A y axis 2002 represents a risk level rating, ranging from 0 at the origin to 100. An x axis 2004 represents time, wherein a plurality of normalized test results is plotted on the chart 2000. The chart 2000 is further divided into sections across the y axis 2002, indicating various risk level thresholds. For instance, and as illustrated in the chart 2000, there may be at certain rating levels different thresholds of risk labeled as low, moderate, above average, and high risk levels. These thresholds may be moved over time as more data is accumulated via users conducting tests and the mobile application storing the data on the tests. When a user conducts a test, the user's normalized rating can be plotted similarly to past test results and weighed against them in order to provide a risk level for the user.

Referring now to FIG. 21, there is illustrated the mobile device 802 displaying on the screen 804 a mobile application variable test functionality. There is displayed on the screen 804 a plurality of test functions 2102. The plurality of test functions 2102 may be buttons that can be selected by a user to switch between tests within the mobile application. This allows for all test functions to be within the same mobile application. For each test run by the mobile application, data for the particular test chosen is utilized in performing the test, pulling the data from the remote server 1206.

Referring now to FIG. 22, there is illustrated the mobile device 802 of FIG. 8B, wherein the housing 302 of the testing device 300 also includes thereon test function indicators 2202 and 2204. The test function indicators 2202 and 2204 are visual markers located on the housing 302 that identify to the mobile application the types of tests for which the testing device 300 is configured. These indicators may be any symbol, alphanumeric character, shape, etc. that can be added to the surface of the testing device 300. The mobile application is programmed to recognize the indicator and perform the test function associated with the indicator. For example, the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 22 shows a “P” symbol for test function indicator 2202 and a “Z” symbol for test function indicator 2204. In this embodiment, test function indicator 2202 indicates that one test strip in the testing device 300 is a pregnancy test, while test function indicator 2204 indicates that one test strip in the testing device 300 is a Zika test. This is used for merely illustrative purposes, and any recognizable symbol may be used for these two test functions, and any other type of test may have a symbol assigned in this way as well. Further, in some embodiments there may only be one indicator on the housing 302, even if there are multiple tests. This single indicator would be for the combined test. For example, if the testing device 300 of FIG. 22 had a single symbol of “PZ,” this would indicate that the testing device 300 is a combined pregnancy and Zika testing device, allowing for the mobile application to recognize such and perform each test with knowledge of which strip is associated with which test based on the stored data on the testing device associated with the “PZ” symbol.

Referring now to FIG. 23, there is illustrated a diagrammatic view of one embodiment of an image recognition neural network 2300. Neural networks are non-parametric methods used for machine learning such as pattern recognition and optimization. They are able to generate an output based on a weighted sum of inputs, which is then passed through an activation function. Typically, the activation function determines the output by summing the inputs multiplied by the weights. A basic activation function is that of y=f(Σwx), where x is the vector of inputs, w is the vector of weights, f(.) is the activation function, and y is the output vector. It will be understood by those skilled in the art that variations on the activation function may be used or represented in other ways, such as the activation function: a=Σ_(i=0) ^(i=n) w_(i)x_(i). Yet another activation function is the softmax activation function, which is generally used for probabilities. The softmax function is:

$(x) = {\frac{e^{x}}{\sum e^{x}}.}$

The inputs, weights, and outputs may be organized within a multilayer perceptron (MLP), wherein there is an input layer, one or more hidden layers, and an output layer. As shown in the network 2300, a plurality of inputs 2302 reside in the input layer, a plurality of neurons 2304 (the weights) reside in the hidden layer or layers, and first output 2306 and a second output 2308 reside in the output layer. It will be appreciated that the neural network 3300 may contain any number of inputs, neurons, from 1 to n. Thus, this creates a feedforward network. A feedforward network, as shown in FIG. 23, is called such because the inputs in the input layer feed into each of the neurons in the hidden layer or layers, which in turn feed into each of the outputs in the output layer, with each output in the output layer providing a result. When used within the image analysis disclosed herein concerning the medical testing devices, the first output 2306 may indicate a positive result and the second output 2308 may indicate a negative result. The first and second outputs 2306 and 2308 may indicate the likelihood of a positive or negative result. As an example, the actual output may be a value such as 0.95, which would indicate a high likelihood of a positive result. The inputs would be image values for the image of the testing device taken in accordance with the processes described herein. An image may be an array of values for each pixel, indicating the color and/or darkness or intensity of that particular pixel. If only darkness or intensity is being tested for, a pixel may be converted to grayscale so that each pixel only has a single intensity value. An array consisting of the intensity values for each pixel could then be fed into the neural network as the inputs. The image may be separated into a grid a pixels (such as an 18×18 image with 324 pixels). The values in the array may be ordered in the same order as the grid, starting with the tile at the top left and going right across each row of the grid. If color detection is also needed in addition to intensity, each value may be an RGB color vector having a value for each of red, green, and blue for a particular pixel.

Although there could be any number of hidden layers, typically ranging from one to three, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that a single hidden layer can estimate differentiable functions, provided there are enough hidden units. A higher number of hidden layers also increases processing time and the amount of adjustments needed during neural network training. One method of determining the number of needed neurons in the hidden layer is represented by: N_(h)=√{square root over (N_(i)·N_(o))}, where N_(h) is the number of hidden nodes, N_(i) is the number of input nodes, and N_(o) is the number of output nodes. It will be appreciated that the number of neurons will change depending on the number of inputs and outputs. Further, the method for determining the number of neurons may also be different, as this is but one example.

It will be understood by those skilled in the art that the neural network would be trained in order for the neural network to become more accurate. Various training methods exist, such as supervised learning where random weights are fed into the neural network and adjusted accordingly, backpropagation methods, or other methods. Activation functions are applied to the weighted sum of the inputs to generate a certain outcome. The weights may be set to small random values initially. The input pattern may then be applied and propagated through the network until a certain output is generated for the hidden layer. For training image recognition, training images may be used, with the training images being a collection of images that may show either a positive or negative result. The neural network would be trained to look for values in the same area of the array as the positive training images. For instance, if in a grid of pixels a particular grid in the training images has an extremely dark or intense color (with an associated value), the neural network would look for values near that value in determining the likelihood that a new image indicates a positive result. What constitutes a value that is near may be set by the training images, with the line between what indicates a positive result or a negative result being defined by those in the training images. For example, if a positive training image includes a pixel value of 250 at a particular pixel, another positive training image has a pixel value of 150 at that same pixel, and a negative training image has a pixel value or 75 at that same pixel, the neural network may be trained to indicate that a pixel value at this location of an image below 76 is indicative of a negative result, the network may be trained to meet in the middle at 112, etc. The neural network may through training determine that if a pixel is within a certain degree (such as 10 percent) of a positive result value, then a positive result is indicated, etc. Of course, the totality of the image including each pixel would factor into the overall determination of a positive or negative result and while one pixel may indicate a positive result, if enough of the other pixel indicate a negative result, the overall result may be negative. Training results may be collected including the number of true positives, true negatives, false positives, and false negatives. If the number or percentage of false positives and negatives appear too high, additional training may be required.

The outputs of the hidden layer are used as entries for the output layer. Weighted and summed up, they are passed through an activation function to produce the final output. The way the weights are modified to meet the desired results defines the training algorithm and is essentially an optimization problem. When the activation functions are differentiable, the error back-propagation algorithm may be a good approach in progressing towards the minimum of the error function. The errors are then passed back through the network using the gradient, by calculating the contribution of each hidden node and deriving the adjustments needed to generate an output that is closer to the target value. Weights can then be adjusted taking also into account the modification from the previous cycle, this method being called back-propagation with momentum rate.

It will be understood by those skilled in the art that neural networks can be set up and trained in various ways and that the above description is illustrative of but one method. It will be appreciated that the neural network may be organized in any way to allow for the functionality disclosed herein. It will also be understood that a different neural network may be used for each type of test to account for the different test line color or intensity indicative of a positive result, shapes of testing devices, etc.

The above described neural network allows for recognition of pixels within particular areas of an image. This is effective when using the processes described herein for aligning a testing device with a camera so that the images taken all include the test line and its associated pixels in the same locations as the training image. However, to account for an image having pixels for the test line or other result indicator being in a different area of the image, such as if a user's hand twitches suddenly as the image is taken, other embodiments may include the ability to recognize test line color and intensity even when the test line is not always in the same location in the image. This can be done using convolution. Convolution involves dividing an image into a plurality of tile images to be fed into a neural network, rather than feeding entire images as one grid of numbers.

Referring now to FIGS. 24-28, there is shown diagrammatic views of a convolution neural network image recognition process. FIG. 24 illustrates an image of a testing device 2402 where the image is divided into a plurality of equally-sized tiles 2404. It will be understood that the number of tiles may be different depending on the image and the number shown in FIG. 24 is used for example purposes. Each tile's pixel values are then used as the inputs into a neural network 2502 to produce a series of outputs 2504, as shown in FIG. 25. The process of FIG. 25 is repeated for every tile formed in the process of FIG. 24. In some embodiments, the same weights for the neural network may be used for each tile to treat each tile equally. The outputs here represent the closest matches to the trained images, with each tile having a particular likelihood of being a match. In other words, each tile is marked as being more or less likely to indicate a match to the trained neural network. The process of feeding each tile into the neural network 2502 is represented by FIG. 26, wherein it is shown each tile passing through the neural network to output an array of output sets 2602. In this way, each result from processing each tile is saved into a grid in the same arrangement as the original image.

The array of output sets 2602 may have a large number of outputs, since each tile potentially at least one output result. Therefore, it may be beneficial to reduce the number of sets in the array 2602 by using downsampling. Downsampling analyzes the results, often in groups such as a 2×2 square of the array 2602 and as shown in FIG. 27, to determine if anything appears in a tile that may be indicative of the result sought. For example, the outputs for one tile may have low likelihood values if the tile is simply of a gray testing device body, rather than that of a tile showing the test or control line. If the test line is red, tiles showing a portion or portions from the test line may achieve a higher output and will be retained, while those with low rating will be discarded, so as to reduce the number of results used for the remainder of the process. This is illustrated in FIG. 27 where outputs for tiles that have better results (shown in circles) are kept and placed into a new max-pooled array group 2702, while other results are discarded.

Now that the original image has been reduced to a smaller array of numbers (the max-pooled array group 2702), that array may be input into another neural network to test for the likelihood of a positive or negative test result, as shown in FIG. 28. This neural network is labeled as a fully-connected neural network 2802, to differentiate this neural network from the neural network 2502 used in the convolution step shown in FIG. 26. Based on these inputs produced from separating the original image into tiles, a positive results 2804 or a negative result 2806 may be achieved even when reference points of the image, such as the location of the test line, are at different locations in the image than that of the images used to train the neural network. It will be understood that convolution may or may not be used depending on if images taken by users are consistently stable, resulting in the test line being in the same location as that of the training images.

Referring now to FIG. 29, different layers of processing may be performed, such as multiple convolutions, such as those shown in FIG. 29. Similar existing architectural structures may be used to achieve the required results, such as architectures like Google's Inception architecture found at www.tensorflow.org and https://codelabs.developers.google.com/codelabshensorflow-for-poets/#0, which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety. Such architecture would allow for only the top layer (the classification of positive or negative medical test results) to be altered and the neural network trained on training images to produce accurate neural network results.

It should be understood that the drawings and detailed description herein are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive manner, and are not intended to be limiting to the particular forms and examples disclosed. On the contrary, included are any further modifications, changes, rearrangements, substitutions, alternatives, design choices, and embodiments apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art, without departing from the spirit and scope hereof, as defined by the following claims. Thus, it is intended that the following claims be interpreted to embrace all such further modifications, changes, rearrangements, substitutions, alternatives, design choices, and embodiments. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A system for providing diagnostic test results, the system comprising: a trained neural network having a plurality of inputs and at least two outputs for determining a diagnostic test result responsive to an input array; and a server associated with the trained neural network and configured to: receive, from a mobile device, an image of a testing device including one or more immunoassay test strips, process the image to determine pixel count and pixel values for each pixel of each of the one or more immunoassay test strips, create a pixel value array from the determined pixel values in the image, provide the pixel value array as inputs in the trained neural network, and determine diagnostic test results by the trained neural network responsive to the pixel value array provided as the inputs to the trained neural network.
 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the one or more immunoassay test strips further include a test line of one of the one or more immunoassay test strips includes Zika virus antigen and the test line of another one of the one or more immunoassay test strips includes an antibody suitable for binding with hCG.
 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the diagnostic test results include a quantitative result.
 4. The system of claim 3, wherein the quantitative result includes a reaction rating.
 5. The system of claim 1, wherein the diagnostic test results include a qualitative result.
 6. The system of claim 1, wherein the diagnostic test results include either a positive or negative result.
 7. The system of claim 1, wherein the trained neural network determines the diagnostic test results by performing a weighting function and a summing function on the pixel value array provided as the inputs to the trained neural network.
 8. The system of claim 1, wherein the trained neural network comprises: an input layer having a plurality of input nodes for receiving the pixel value array; at least one hidden layer having a plurality of nodes for providing a weighted sum of the inputs provided by the pixel value array; and an output layer having a plurality of nodes providing the at least two outputs for determining the diagnostic test results responsive to the weighted sum of the inputs provided by the at least one hidden layer.
 9. The system of claim 1, wherein the server is further configured to: create a plurality of pixel arrays from the determined pixel values in the image, provide each of the plurality of pixel arrays as separate inputs in the trained neural network, and determine the diagnostic test results by the trained neural network responsive to the plurality of pixel arrays provided as the inputs to the trained neural network.
 10. The system of claim 1, wherein the server is further configured to: create a plurality of pixel arrays from the determined pixel values in the image, downsample the plurality of pixel arrays to determine a subset of the plurality of pixel arrays, provide each of the subset of the plurality of pixel arrays as separate inputs in the trained neural network, and determine the diagnostic test results by the trained neural network responsive to the subset of the plurality of pixel arrays provided as the inputs to the trained neural network.
 11. A method for providing diagnostic test results, the method comprising: training a neural network having a plurality of inputs and at least two outputs for determining a diagnostic test result responsive to an input array; receiving, by a server from a mobile device, an image of a testing device including one or more immunoassay test strips; processing the image to determine pixel count and pixel values for each pixel of each of the one or more immunoassay test strips; creating, by the server, a pixel value array from the determined pixel values in the image; providing, by the server, the pixel value array as inputs in the trained neural network; and determining, by the server, diagnostic test results by the trained neural network responsive to the pixel value array provided as the inputs to the trained neural network.
 12. The method of claim 11, wherein the one or more immunoassay test strips further include a test line of one of the one or more immunoassay test strips includes Zika virus antigen and the test line of another one of the one or more immunoassay test strips includes an antibody suitable for binding with hCG.
 13. The method of claim 11, wherein the diagnostic test results include a quantitative result.
 14. The method of claim 13, wherein the quantitative result includes a reaction rating.
 15. The method of claim 11, wherein the diagnostic test results include a qualitative result.
 16. The method of claim 11, wherein the diagnostic test results include either a positive or negative result.
 17. The method of claim 11, wherein the step of creating further comprises the step of creating a plurality of pixel arrays from the determined pixel values in the image.
 18. The method of claim 17, wherein the step of providing further comprises the step of providing each of the plurality of pixel arrays as separate inputs in the trained neural network.
 19. The method of claim 18, wherein the step of determining further comprises the step of determining the diagnostic test results by the trained neural network responsive to the plurality of pixel arrays provided as the inputs to the trained neural network.
 20. A system for providing diagnostic test results, the system comprising: a plurality of trained neural network each associated with a different immunoassay test strip and each having a plurality of inputs and at least two outputs for determining a diagnostic test result responsive to an input array; and a server associated with the plurality of trained neural network and configured to: receive, from a mobile device, an image of a testing device including one or more immunoassay test strips; process the image to determine pixel count and pixel values for each pixel of each of the one or more immunoassay test strips; create a pixel value array from the determined pixel values for each of the one or more immunoassay test strips in the image; provide the pixel value array as inputs in a trained neural network associated with the one or more immunoassay test strips in the image; and determine diagnostic test results by the trained neural network responsive to the pixel value array provided as the inputs to the trained neural network. 